Skip to Main Content (Press Enter)

Logo UNIMORE
  • ×
  • Home
  • Corsi
  • Insegnamenti
  • Professioni
  • Persone
  • Pubblicazioni
  • Strutture
  • Terza Missione
  • Attività
  • Competenze

UNI-FIND
Logo UNIMORE

|

UNI-FIND

unimore.it
  • ×
  • Home
  • Corsi
  • Insegnamenti
  • Professioni
  • Persone
  • Pubblicazioni
  • Strutture
  • Terza Missione
  • Attività
  • Competenze
  1. Pubblicazioni

Impact of Residual Setup Error on Parotid Gland Dose in Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy with or without Planning Organ-at-Risk Margin

Articolo
Data di Pubblicazione:
2009
Citazione:
Impact of Residual Setup Error on Parotid Gland Dose in Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy with or without Planning Organ-at-Risk Margin / Delana, A., Menegotti, L., Bolner, A., Tomio, L., Valentini, A., Lohr, F., Vanoni, V.. - In: STRAHLENTHERAPIE UND ONKOLOGIE. - ISSN 0179-7158. - 185:7(2009), pp. 453-459. [10.1007/s00066-009-1888-9]
Abstract:
Purpose: To estimate the dosimetric impact of residual setup errors on parotid sparing in head-and-neck (H&N) intensity-modutated treatments and to evaluate the effect of employing an PRV (planning organ-at-risk volume) margin for the parotid gland. Patients and Methods: Ten patients treated for H&N cancer were considered. A nine-beam intensity-modutated radiotherapy (IMRT) was planned for each patient. A second optimization was performed prescribing dose constraint to the PRV of the parotid gland. Systematic setup errors of 2 mm, 3 mm, and 5 mm were simulated. The dose-volume histograms of the shifted and reference plans were compared with regard to mean parotid gland dose (MPD), normal-tissue complication probability (NTCP), and coverage of the clinical target volume (V(95%) and equivalent uniform dose [EUD]); the sensitivity of parotid sparing on setup error was evaluated with a probability-based approach. Results: MPD increased by 3.4%/mm and 3.0%/mm for displacements in the craniocaudal and lateral direction and by 0.7%/mm for displacements in the anterior-posterior direction. The probability to irradiate the parotid with a mean dose > 30 Gy was > 50%, for setup errors in cranial and lateral direction and < 10% in the anterior-posterior direction. The addition of a PRV margin improved parotid sparing, with a relative reduction in NTCP of 14%. The PRV margin compensates for setup errors of 3 mm and 5 mm (MPD <= 30 Gy in 87% and 60% of cases), without affecting clinical target volume coverage (V(95%) and EUD variations < 1% and < 1 Gy). Conclusion: The parotid gland is more sensitive to craniocaudal and lateral displacements. A setup error of 2 mm guarantees an MPD : 30 Gy in most cases, without adding a PRV margin. If greater displacements are expected/accepted, an adequate PRV margin could be used to meet the clinical parotid gland constraint of 30 Gy, without affecting target volume coverage.
Tipologia CRIS:
Articolo su rivista
Keywords:
Head and neck; IMRT; Parotid sparing; PRV parotid gland; Setup error;
Elenco autori:
Delana, A; Menegotti, L; Bolner, A; Tomio, L; Valentini, A; Lohr, F; Vanoni, V
Link alla scheda completa:
https://iris.unimore.it/handle/11380/1172407
Pubblicato in:
STRAHLENTHERAPIE UND ONKOLOGIE
Journal
  • Utilizzo dei cookie

Realizzato con VIVO | Designed by Cineca | 26.5.2.0