Skip to Main Content (Press Enter)

Logo UNIMORE
  • ×
  • Home
  • Corsi
  • Insegnamenti
  • Professioni
  • Persone
  • Pubblicazioni
  • Strutture
  • Terza Missione
  • Attività
  • Competenze

UNI-FIND
Logo UNIMORE

|

UNI-FIND

unimore.it
  • ×
  • Home
  • Corsi
  • Insegnamenti
  • Professioni
  • Persone
  • Pubblicazioni
  • Strutture
  • Terza Missione
  • Attività
  • Competenze
  1. Pubblicazioni

Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-cell Therapy in Hematologic Malignancies and Patient-reported Outcomes: A Scoping Review

Articolo
Data di Pubblicazione:
2022
Citazione:
Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-cell Therapy in Hematologic Malignancies and Patient-reported Outcomes: A Scoping Review / Efficace, F.; Cannella, L.; Sparano, F.; Giesinger, J. M.; Vignetti, M.; Baron, F.; Bruera, E.; Luppi, M.; Platzbecker, U.. - In: HEMASPHERE. - ISSN 2572-9241. - 6:12(2022), pp. 1-13. [10.1097/HS9.0000000000000802]
Abstract:
The inclusion of patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures in chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy research is critical for understanding the impact of this novel approach from a unique patient standpoint. We performed a scoping review to map the available literature on the use of PRO measures in CAR T-cell therapy studies of patients with hematologic malignancies published between January 2015 and July 2022. Fourteen studies were identified, of which 7 (50%) were investigational early-phase trials, 6 (42.9%) were observational studies, and 1 (7.1%) was a pilot study. The EQ-5D and the PROMIS-29 were the 2 most frequently used PRO measures, being included in 6 (42.9%) and 5 (35.7%) studies, respectively. Despite differences in study designs, there seems to be evidence of improvements over time since CAR T-cell infusion in important domains such as physical functioning and fatigue, at least in patients who respond to therapy. Overall, the studies identified in our review have shown the added value of PRO assessment in CAR T-cell therapy research by providing novel information that complements the knowledge on safety and efficacy. However, there are several questions which remain to be answered in future research. For example, limited evidence exists regarding patient experience during important phases of the disease trajectory as only 4 (28.6%) and 5 (35.7%) studies provided information on PROs during the first 2 weeks from CAR T-cell infusion and after the first year, respectively. Time is ripe for a more systematic implementation of high-quality PRO assessment in future clinical trials and in real-life settings of patients treated with CAR T-cell therapy.
Tipologia CRIS:
Articolo su rivista
Elenco autori:
Efficace, F.; Cannella, L.; Sparano, F.; Giesinger, J. M.; Vignetti, M.; Baron, F.; Bruera, E.; Luppi, M.; Platzbecker, U.
Autori di Ateneo:
LUPPI Mario
Link alla scheda completa:
https://iris.unimore.it/handle/11380/1296809
Link al Full Text:
https://iris.unimore.it//retrieve/handle/11380/1296809/487362/Chimeric_Antigen_Receptor_T_cell_Therapy_in.11.pdf
Pubblicato in:
HEMASPHERE
Journal
  • Utilizzo dei cookie

Realizzato con VIVO | Designed by Cineca | 26.5.0.0