The Impact of PSMA-PET on Oncologic Control in Prostate Cancer Patients Who Experienced PSA Persistence or Recurrence
Articolo
Data di Pubblicazione:
2023
Citazione:
The Impact of PSMA-PET on Oncologic Control in Prostate Cancer Patients Who Experienced PSA Persistence or Recurrence / Bianchi, L.; Ceci, F.; Costa, F.; Balestrazzi, E.; Droghetti, M.; Piazza, P.; Pissavini, A.; Mei, R.; Farolfi, A.; Castellucci, P.; Puliatti, S.; Larcher, A.; Gandaglia, G.; Robesti, D.; Mottrie, A.; Briganti, A.; Morganti, A. G.; Fanti, S.; Montorsi, F.; Schiavina, R.; Brunocilla, E.. - In: CANCERS. - ISSN 2072-6694. - 15:1(2023), pp. 247-247. [10.3390/cancers15010247]
Abstract:
Background: Prostate Specific Membrane Antigen-Positron Emission Tomography (PSMA-PET) is currently recommended to restage prostate cancer (PCa) and to guide the delivery of salvage treatments. We aim to evaluate the oncologic outcomes of patients with recurrent PCa who received PSMA-PET. Methods: 324 hormone-sensitive PCa with PSA relapse after radical prostatectomy who underwent PSMA-PET in three high-volume European Centres. Patients have been stratified as pre-salvage who never received salvage treatments (n = 134), and post-salvage, including patients who received previous salvage therapies (n = 190). Patients with oligorecurrent (≤3 lesions), PSMA-positive disease underwent PSMA-directed treatments: salvage radiotherapy (sRT) or Metastases-directed therapy (MDT). Patients with polirecurrent (>3 lesions) PSMA-positive disease were treated with systemic therapy. Patients with negative PSMA-PET were treated with sRT or systemic therapies or observation. The primary outcome of the study was Progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary outcomes were: Metastases-free survival (MFS) and Castration Resistant Pca free survival (CRPC-FS). Results: median follow up was 23 months. In the pre-salvage setting, the PFS, MFS and CRPC-FS estimates at 3 years were 66.2% vs. 38.9%, 95.2% vs. 73.7% and 94.9% vs. 93.1% in patients with negative vs. positive PSMA-PET, respectively (all p ≥ 0.2). In the post-salvage setting, the PFS, MFS and CRPC-FS estimates at 3 years were 59.5% vs. 29.1%, 92.7% vs. 65.1% and 98.8% vs. 88.8% in patients with negative vs. positive PSMA-PET, respectively (all p ≤ 0.01). At multivariable analyses, a positive PSMA-PET was an independent predictor of progression (HR = 2.15) and metastatic disease (HR 2.37; all p ≤ 0.03). Conclusion: PSMA-PET in recurrent PCa detects the site of recurrence guiding salvage treatments and has a prognostic role in patients who received previous salvage treatments.
Tipologia CRIS:
Articolo su rivista
Keywords:
hormone sensitive prostate cancer; PSMA-guided salvage treatment; PSMA-PET; recurrent prostate cancer; survival
Elenco autori:
Bianchi, L.; Ceci, F.; Costa, F.; Balestrazzi, E.; Droghetti, M.; Piazza, P.; Pissavini, A.; Mei, R.; Farolfi, A.; Castellucci, P.; Puliatti, S.; Larcher, A.; Gandaglia, G.; Robesti, D.; Mottrie, A.; Briganti, A.; Morganti, A. G.; Fanti, S.; Montorsi, F.; Schiavina, R.; Brunocilla, E.
Link alla scheda completa:
Link al Full Text:
Pubblicato in: