Skip to Main Content (Press Enter)

Logo UNIMORE
  • ×
  • Home
  • Corsi
  • Insegnamenti
  • Professioni
  • Persone
  • Pubblicazioni
  • Strutture
  • Terza Missione
  • Attività
  • Competenze

UNI-FIND
Logo UNIMORE

|

UNI-FIND

unimore.it
  • ×
  • Home
  • Corsi
  • Insegnamenti
  • Professioni
  • Persone
  • Pubblicazioni
  • Strutture
  • Terza Missione
  • Attività
  • Competenze
  1. Pubblicazioni

Low-cost reusable instrumentation for laparoendoscopic single-site nephrectomy: assessment in a porcine model

Articolo
Data di Pubblicazione:
2011
Citazione:
Low-cost reusable instrumentation for laparoendoscopic single-site nephrectomy: assessment in a porcine model / R., Autorino; F. J., Kim; A., Rane; M., De Sio; R. J., Stein; R., Damiano; Micali, Salvatore; J., Correia Pinto; J. H., Kaouk; E., Lima. - In: JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY. - ISSN 0892-7790. - ELETTRONICO. - 25:3(2011), pp. 419-424. [10.1089/end.2010.0415]
Abstract:
PURPOSE: To test different sets of prebent instruments and a new reusable access device for laparoendoscopic single-site (LESS) surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three surgeons with previous experience in LESS performed 12 nephrectomies in six pigs. In all procedures, a multichannel access device (X-CONE) and a 5-mm extra-long telescope were used. Four sets of prebent instruments with different profiles (S-portal) were tested: Standard (one straight scissors and one curved grasper), Cuschieri, Carus, and Leroy set (each of them consisting of two curved instruments with different configurations). Assessment was performed based on both objective (procedure time; time to manage the pedicle; time to free kidney) and subjective parameters (entry/exit of instruments; triangulation; dissection up/down; dissection lateral; retraction; interdependence). The subjective assessment tool used was a Likert type scale (1 = easy to 5 = prohibitive). The access device was assessed by using objective (time to complete insertion of device after skin incision) and subjective (significant air leakage, movement constraint) parameters. RESULTS: Time to insertion of the X-CONE was <1 minute in all the cases. Surgeons reported significant insufflant leakage in 58% of cases. The procedure was completed in 10/12 (83%) cases. Mean operative time was 8.3 ± 4.2 minutes, being lower for the Carus group (4.5 min) and higher for the standard group (13 min). Among the different sets, the standard one obtained the best mean scores for all subjective parameters. CONCLUSIONS: X-CONE allows easy abdominal access, and its reusable properties represent cost savings for LESS compared with disposable devices. Prebent instruments might also represent attractive low-cost tools for LESS.
Tipologia CRIS:
Articolo su rivista
Keywords:
Low-cost; instrumentation; laparoendoscopic; nephrectomy; porcine model
Elenco autori:
R., Autorino; F. J., Kim; A., Rane; M., De Sio; R. J., Stein; R., Damiano; Micali, Salvatore; J., Correia Pinto; J. H., Kaouk; E., Lima
Autori di Ateneo:
MICALI Salvatore
Link alla scheda completa:
https://iris.unimore.it/handle/11380/709398
Pubblicato in:
JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY
Journal
  • Utilizzo dei cookie

Realizzato con VIVO | Designed by Cineca | 26.5.0.0