Skip to Main Content (Press Enter)

Logo UNIMORE
  • ×
  • Home
  • Corsi
  • Insegnamenti
  • Professioni
  • Persone
  • Pubblicazioni
  • Strutture
  • Terza Missione
  • Attività
  • Competenze

UNI-FIND
Logo UNIMORE

|

UNI-FIND

unimore.it
  • ×
  • Home
  • Corsi
  • Insegnamenti
  • Professioni
  • Persone
  • Pubblicazioni
  • Strutture
  • Terza Missione
  • Attività
  • Competenze
  1. Pubblicazioni

Progression to refractory status epilepticus: A machine learning analysis by means of classification and regression tree analysis

Articolo
Data di Pubblicazione:
2024
Citazione:
Progression to refractory status epilepticus: A machine learning analysis by means of classification and regression tree analysis / Meletti, S.; Giovannini, G.; Lattanzi, S.; Zaboli, A.; Orlandi, N.; Turcato, G.; Brigo, F.. - In: EPILEPSY & BEHAVIOR. - ISSN 1525-5050. - 161:(2024), pp. N/A-N/A. [10.1016/j.yebeh.2024.110005]
Abstract:
Background and Objectives: to identify predictors of progression to refractory status epilepticus (RSE) using a machine learning technique. Methods: Consecutive patients aged >= 14 years with SE registered in a 9-years period at Modena Academic Hospital were included in the analysis. We evaluated the risk of progression to RSE using logistic regression and a machine learning analysis by means of classification and regression tree analysis (CART) to develop a predictive model of progression to RSE. Results: 705 patients with SE were included in the study; of those, 33 % (233/705) evolved to RSE. The progression to RSE was an independent risk factor for 30-day mortality, with an OR adjusted for previously identified possible univariate confounders of 4.086 (CI 95 % 2.390-6.985; p < 0.001). According to CART the most important variable predicting evolution to RSE was the impaired consciousness before treatment, followed by acute symptomatic hypoxic etiology and periodic EEG patterns. The decision tree identified 14 nodes with a risk of evolution to RSE ranging from 1.5 % to 90.8 %. The overall percentage of success in classifying patients of the decision tree was 79.4 %; the percentage of accurate prediction was high, 94.1 %, for those patients not progressing to RSE and moderate, 49.8 %, for patients evolving to RSE. Conclusions: Decision-tree analysis provided a meaningful risk stratification based on few variables that are easily obtained at SE first evaluation: consciousness before treatment, etiology, and severe EEG patterns. CART models must be viewed as potential new method for the stratification RSE at single subject level deserving further exploration and validation.
Tipologia CRIS:
Articolo su rivista
Keywords:
Machine learning; Prediction; Prognosis; Refractory status epilepticus; Super-refractory status epilepticus
Elenco autori:
Meletti, S.; Giovannini, G.; Lattanzi, S.; Zaboli, A.; Orlandi, N.; Turcato, G.; Brigo, F.
Autori di Ateneo:
MELETTI Stefano
Link alla scheda completa:
https://iris.unimore.it/handle/11380/1363472
Link al Full Text:
https://iris.unimore.it//retrieve/handle/11380/1363472/713600/1-s2.0-S152550502400386X-main.pdf
Pubblicato in:
EPILEPSY & BEHAVIOR
Journal
  • Utilizzo dei cookie

Realizzato con VIVO | Designed by Cineca | 26.5.0.0