Skip to Main Content (Press Enter)

Logo UNIMORE
  • ×
  • Home
  • Corsi
  • Insegnamenti
  • Professioni
  • Persone
  • Pubblicazioni
  • Strutture
  • Terza Missione
  • Attività
  • Competenze

UNI-FIND
Logo UNIMORE

|

UNI-FIND

unimore.it
  • ×
  • Home
  • Corsi
  • Insegnamenti
  • Professioni
  • Persone
  • Pubblicazioni
  • Strutture
  • Terza Missione
  • Attività
  • Competenze
  1. Pubblicazioni

Chlorhexidine vaginal flushings versus systemic ampicillin in the prevention of vertical transmission of neonatal group B streptococcus, at term.

Articolo
Data di Pubblicazione:
2002
Citazione:
Chlorhexidine vaginal flushings versus systemic ampicillin in the prevention of vertical transmission of neonatal group B streptococcus, at term / Facchinetti, Fabio; F., Piccinini; B., Mordini; Volpe, Annibale. - In: THE JOURNAL OF MATERNAL-FETAL & NEONATAL MEDICINE. - ISSN 1476-7058. - STAMPA. - 11:2(2002), pp. 84-88. [10.1080/jmf.11.2.84.88]
Abstract:
To investigate the efficacy of intrapartum vaginal flushings with chlorhexidine compared with ampicillin in preventing group B streptococcus transmission to neonates.This was a randomized controlled study, including singleton pregnancies delivering vaginally. Rupture of membranes, when present, must not have occurred more than 6 h previously. Women with any gestational complication, with a newborn previously affected by group B streptococcus sepsis or whose cervical dilatation was greater than 5 cm were excluded. A total of 244 group B streptococcus-colonized mothers at term (screened at 36-38 weeks) were randomized to receive either 140 ml chlorhexidine 0.2\% by vaginal flushings every 6 h or ampicillin 2 g intravenously every 6 h until delivery. Neonatal swabs were taken at birth, at three different sites (nose, ear and gastric juice).A total of 108 women were treated with ampicillin and 109 with chlorhexidine. Their ages and gestational weeks at delivery were similar in the two groups. Nulliparous women were equally distributed between the two groups (ampicillin, 87\%; chlorhexidine, 89\%). Clinical data such as birth weight (ampicillin, 3,365 +/- 390 g; chlorhexidine, 3,440 +/- 452 g), Apgar scores at 1 min (ampicillin, 8.4 +/- 0.9; chlorhexidine, 8.2 +/- 1.4) and at 5 min (ampicillin, 9.7 +/- 0.6; chlorhexidine, 9.6 +/- 1.1) were similar for the two groups, as was the rate of neonatal group B streptococcus colonization (chlorhexidine, 15.6\%; ampicillin, 12\%). Escherichia coli, on the other hand, was significantly more prevalent in the ampicillin (7.4\%) than in the chlorhexidine group (1.8\%, p < 0.05). Six neonates were transferred to the neonatal intensive care unit, including two cases of early-onset sepsis (one in each group).In this carefully screened target population, intrapartum vaginal flushings with chlorhexidine in colonized mothers display the same efficacy as ampicillin in preventing vertical transmission of group B streptococcus. Moreover, the rate of neonatal E. coli colonization was reduced by chlorhexidine.
Tipologia CRIS:
Articolo su rivista
Keywords:
Administration; Intravaginal, Adult, Ampicillin; therapeutic use, Chlorhexidine; administration /&/ dosage, Escherichia coli; isolation /&/ purification, Female, Humans, Infant; Newborn, Infectious Disease Transmission; Vertical, Labor; Obstetric, Parity, Pregnancy, Streptococcal Infections; prevention /&/ control/transmission, Streptococcus agalactiae; isolation /&/ purification, Time Factors, Vagina; microbiology
Elenco autori:
Facchinetti, Fabio; F., Piccinini; B., Mordini; Volpe, Annibale
Autori di Ateneo:
FACCHINETTI Fabio
Link alla scheda completa:
https://iris.unimore.it/handle/11380/740795
Pubblicato in:
THE JOURNAL OF MATERNAL-FETAL & NEONATAL MEDICINE
Journal
  • Dati Generali

Dati Generali

URL

http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/jmf.11.2.84.88
  • Utilizzo dei cookie

Realizzato con VIVO | Designed by Cineca | 26.5.1.0