Skip to Main Content (Press Enter)

Logo UNIMORE
  • ×
  • Home
  • Corsi
  • Insegnamenti
  • Professioni
  • Persone
  • Pubblicazioni
  • Strutture
  • Terza Missione
  • Attività
  • Competenze

UNI-FIND
Logo UNIMORE

|

UNI-FIND

unimore.it
  • ×
  • Home
  • Corsi
  • Insegnamenti
  • Professioni
  • Persone
  • Pubblicazioni
  • Strutture
  • Terza Missione
  • Attività
  • Competenze
  1. Pubblicazioni

Neoadjuvant Immunotherapy in Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Systematic Literature Review and State of the Art

Articolo
Data di Pubblicazione:
2025
Citazione:
Neoadjuvant Immunotherapy in Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Systematic Literature Review and State of the Art / Spadafora, Marco; Paganelli, Alessia; Raucci, Margherita; Kaleci, Shaniko; Peris, Ketty; Guida, Stefania; Pellacani, Giovanni; Longo, Caterina. - In: CANCERS. - ISSN 2072-6694. - 17:4(2025), pp. 0-0. [10.3390/cancers17040637]
Abstract:
Background/Objectives: Cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) is a prevalent skin cancer with increasing incidence worldwide. High-risk cSCCs often require extensive surgical treatments, which can impair anatomical function and aesthetics. Neoadjuvant immunotherapy, particularly immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) such as cemiplimab and pembrolizumab, has emerged as a promising approach to enhance tumor control and surgical outcomes. We performed a systematic review to evaluate the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant immunotherapy in high-risk cSCC. Methods: A systematic review and proportional meta-analysis focusing on neoadjuvant immunotherapy for cSCC were conducted following PRISMA guidelines. MEDLINE and Scopus databases were searched up to September 2024 using predefined terms. Recorded findings were pathological/radiological response, 1-year disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS). Data extraction and risk-of-bias assessment were independently performed by two reviewers. Statistical analysis included fixed- and random-effects models, with heterogeneity assessed using Cochran’s Q statistic and the I² index. Results: Nine studies met the inclusion criteria. The pooled pathologic response rate was 72.2% (95% CI: 57.7–84.6), and the radiological response rate was 54.8% (95% CI: 38.6–70.5), with moderate heterogeneity. Pooled 1-year DFS and OS proportions were 91.1% (95% CI: 85.0–95.3) and 90.6% (95% CI: 85.1–95.0), respectively, demonstrating homogeneity across studies. Adverse events were consistent with previously reported immune-related toxicities, with rare severe events. Conclusions: Neoadjuvant immunotherapy is a promising therapeutic strategy for high-risk cSCC, with high pathologic response rates and high survival outcomes. However, standardization of treatment protocols and further trials are needed to optimize efficacy, ensure safety, and assess long-term benefits.
Tipologia CRIS:
Articolo su rivista
Keywords:
cSCC; immunotherapy; neoadjuvant; non-melanoma skin cancer; oncology; skin cancer; squamous cell carcinoma; therapy
Elenco autori:
Spadafora, Marco; Paganelli, Alessia; Raucci, Margherita; Kaleci, Shaniko; Peris, Ketty; Guida, Stefania; Pellacani, Giovanni; Longo, Caterina
Autori di Ateneo:
LONGO Caterina
Spadafora Marco
Link alla scheda completa:
https://iris.unimore.it/handle/11380/1383891
Link al Full Text:
https://iris.unimore.it//retrieve/handle/11380/1383891/915942/cancers-17-00637.pdf
Pubblicato in:
CANCERS
Journal
  • Utilizzo dei cookie

Realizzato con VIVO | Designed by Cineca | 26.5.0.0