Impaired control of an action after supplementary motor area lesion: A case study

The kinematics of the action formed by reaching±grasping an object and placing it on a second target was studied in a patient who su ered from an acute vascular left brain lesion, which a ected the Supplementary Motor Area proper (SMA-proper) (Matelli M, Luppino G. Thalamic input to mesial and superior area 6 in the macaque monkey. Journal of Comparative Neurology 1996;372:59±87, Matelli M, Luppino G, Fogassi L, Rizzolatti G. Thalamic input to inferior area 6 and area 4 in the macaque monkey. Journal of Comparative Neurology 1989;280:468±488), and in ®ve healthy control subjects. The reach kinematics of the controls was a ected by the positions of both the reaching±grasping and the placing targets (Gentilucci M, Negrotti A, Gangitano M. Planning an action. Experimental Brain Research 1997;115:116±28). In contrast, the reach kinematics of the patient was a ected only by the position of the reaching±grasping target. By comparing these results with those previously found in Parkinson's disease patients executing the same action (Gentilucci M, Negrotti A. Planning and executing an action in Parkinson's disease patients. Movement Disorders 1999;1:69±79, Gentilucci M, Negrotti A. The control of an action in Parkinson's disease. Experimental Brain Research 1999;129:269±277), we suggest that the anatomical ``motor'' circuit formed by SMA-proper (see above), Basal Ganglia (BG) and Thalamus (Alexander GE, Crutcher MD. Functional architecture of basal ganglia circuits: neural substrates of parallel processing. Trends in the Neurosciences 1990;13:266±271, Hoover JE, Strick PL. Multiple output channels in the basal ganglia. Nature 1993;259:819±821) may be involved in the control of actions: SMA-proper assembles the sequence of the action, whereas BG updates its parameters and stores them.