Skip to Main Content (Press Enter)

Logo UNIMORE
  • ×
  • Home
  • Degree programmes
  • Modules
  • Jobs
  • People
  • Research Outputs
  • Academic units
  • Third Mission
  • Projects
  • Skills

UNI-FIND
Logo UNIMORE

|

UNI-FIND

unimore.it
  • ×
  • Home
  • Degree programmes
  • Modules
  • Jobs
  • People
  • Research Outputs
  • Academic units
  • Third Mission
  • Projects
  • Skills
  1. Research Outputs

Safety and efficacy of the minilaparotomy for myomectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized and non-randomized controlled trials

Academic Article
Publication Date:
2015
Short description:
Safety and efficacy of the minilaparotomy for myomectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized and non-randomized controlled trials / Palomba, Stefano; Fornaciari, Eleonora; Falbo, Angela; La Sala, Giovanni Battista. - In: REPRODUCTIVE BIOMEDICINE ONLINE. - ISSN 1472-6483. - 30:5(2015), pp. 462-481. [10.1016/j.rbmo.2015.01.013]
abstract:
Myomectomy is the most frequent reproductive surgery to preserve, improve fertility, or both. The present study was designed to assess the safety and efficacy of minilaparotomy for myomectomy through a systematic review of randomized and non-randomized controlled trials with a meta-analysis. All available studies comparing minilaparotomy myomectomy with laparotomy, other minimally invasive surgeries, or both, were included. Available surgical and reproductive data were extrapolated, and a qualitative and quantitative analysis was carried out. Fourteen studies were included in the final analysis for an overall sample of 2151 patients. A total of 1139 patients were treated with minilaparotomy, whereas 239 and 773 patients were treated, respectively, with the laparotomy or laparoscopy. Only two studies comparing minilaparotomy with laparoscopy assessed the reproductive outcomes, and their data synthesis did not demonstrate significant difference between the two surgical techniques. Specific surgical end-points differed significantly between minilaparotomy and laparotomy or laparoscopy, even if those differences were not clinically relevant. In conclusion, current data do not permit a definite conclusion to be drawn. Further studies are needed to clarify the risk-benefit ratio of the minilaparotomy compared with the other minimally invasive surgical procedures for myomectomy to provide clinical recommendations with strong scientific evidence.
Iris type:
Articolo su rivista
Keywords:
fibroid; meta-analysis; minilaparotomy; myomectomy; surgery; systematic review; Female; Humans; Laparotomy; Patient Safety; Uterine Myomectomy; Reproductive Medicine; Developmental Biology
List of contributors:
Palomba, Stefano; Fornaciari, Eleonora; Falbo, Angela; La Sala, Giovanni Battista
Handle:
https://iris.unimore.it/handle/11380/1117189
Published in:
REPRODUCTIVE BIOMEDICINE ONLINE
Journal
  • Overview

Overview

URL

http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1472648315000590
  • Use of cookies

Powered by VIVO | Designed by Cineca | 26.4.5.0