Skip to Main Content (Press Enter)

Logo UNIMORE
  • ×
  • Home
  • Degree programmes
  • Modules
  • Jobs
  • People
  • Research Outputs
  • Academic units
  • Third Mission
  • Projects
  • Skills

UNI-FIND
Logo UNIMORE

|

UNI-FIND

unimore.it
  • ×
  • Home
  • Degree programmes
  • Modules
  • Jobs
  • People
  • Research Outputs
  • Academic units
  • Third Mission
  • Projects
  • Skills
  1. Research Outputs

Postoperative IOL Axial Movements and Refractive Changes After Femtosecond Laser-assisted Cataract Surgery Versus Conventional Phacoemulsification

Academic Article
Publication Date:
2015
Short description:
Postoperative IOL Axial Movements and Refractive Changes After Femtosecond Laser-assisted Cataract Surgery Versus Conventional Phacoemulsification / Toto, L; Mastropasqua, R; Mattei, Pa; Agnifili, L; Mastropasqua, A; Falconio, G; Di Nicola, M; Mastropasqua, L. - In: JOURNAL OF REFRACTIVE SURGERY. - ISSN 1081-597X. - 31:8(2015), pp. 524-530. [10.3928/1081597X-20150727-02]
abstract:
PURPOSE: To evaluate intraocular lens (IOL) axial movements and refractive changes during a 6-month follow-up period after femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery and conventional cataract surgery, investigate the influence of capsulorhexis features on postoperative IOL axial changes, and assess the prediction error for both techniques. METHODS: Eighty eyes of 80 candidates for cataract extraction were randomized into two groups: femtosecond laser (40 eyes) and manual (40 eyes). RESULTS: The overall anterior chamber depth variation was significantly lower in the femtosecond laser group compared to the manual group during follow-up (P<.001). At 30 and 180 days postoperatively, the mean spherical equivalent showed a hyperopic shift (0.09±0.28 diopters [D]) in the femtosecond laser group and a myopic shift in the manual group (-0.25±0.18 D). Median absolute error was not significantly different between the two groups with standard formulas ranging between 0.29 and 0.64 (Hoffer Q) in the femtosecond laser group and between 0.24 (SRK-T) and 0.55 D (Hoffer Q) in the manual group. There was a significant lower deviation from intended versus achieved capsulotomy/capsulorhexis area in the femtosecond laser group (P<.001) compared to the manual group. The femtosecond laser group showed better IOL centration compared to the manual group at all time periods (P<.001). CONCLUSIONS: Femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery was related to a lower overall variability of anterior chamber depth compared to conventional cataract surgery with more stable postoperative refraction. The two techniques did not show significant differences of prediction error.
Iris type:
Articolo su rivista
List of contributors:
Toto, L; Mastropasqua, R; Mattei, Pa; Agnifili, L; Mastropasqua, A; Falconio, G; Di Nicola, M; Mastropasqua, L
Handle:
https://iris.unimore.it/handle/11380/1201153
Published in:
JOURNAL OF REFRACTIVE SURGERY
Journal
  • Use of cookies

Powered by VIVO | Designed by Cineca | 26.4.5.0