Skip to Main Content (Press Enter)

Logo UNIMORE
  • ×
  • Home
  • Corsi
  • Insegnamenti
  • Professioni
  • Persone
  • Pubblicazioni
  • Strutture
  • Terza Missione
  • Attività
  • Competenze

UNI-FIND
Logo UNIMORE

|

UNI-FIND

unimore.it
  • ×
  • Home
  • Corsi
  • Insegnamenti
  • Professioni
  • Persone
  • Pubblicazioni
  • Strutture
  • Terza Missione
  • Attività
  • Competenze
  1. Pubblicazioni

Scientific Committee guidance on appraising and integrating evidence from epidemiological studies for use in EFSA's scientific assessments

Articolo
Data di Pubblicazione:
2024
Citazione:
Scientific Committee guidance on appraising and integrating evidence from epidemiological studies for use in EFSA's scientific assessments / More, S.; Bampidis, V.; Benford, D.; Bragard, C.; Hernandez-Jerez, A.; Bennekou, S. H.; Koutsoumanis, K.; Lambre, C.; Machera, K.; Mennes, W.; Mullins, E.; Nielsen, S. S.; Schlatter, J.; Schrenk, D.; Turck, D.; Younes, M.; Fletcher, T.; Greiner, M.; Ntzani, E.; Pearce, N.; Vinceti, M.; Vrijheid, M.; Georgiadis, M.; Gervelmeyer, A.; Halldorsson, T. I.. - In: EFSA JOURNAL. - ISSN 1831-4732. - 22:7(2024), pp. 1-91. [10.2903/j.efsa.2024.8866]
Abstract:
EFSA requested its Scientific Committee to prepare a guidance document on appraising and integrating evidence from epidemiological studies for use in EFSA's scientific assessments. The guidance document provides an introduction to epidemiological studies and illustrates the typical biases, which may be present in different epidemiological study designs. It then describes key epidemiological concepts relevant for evidence appraisal. This includes brief explanations for measures of association, exposure assessment, statistical inference, systematic error and effect modification. The guidance then describes the concept of external validity and the principles of appraising epidemiological studies. The customisation of the study appraisal process is explained including tailoring of tools for assessing the risk of bias (RoB). Several examples of appraising experimental and observational studies using a RoB tool are annexed to the document to illustrate the application of the approach. The latter part of this guidance focuses on different steps of evidence integration, first within and then across different streams of evidence. With respect to risk characterisation, the guidance considers how evidence from human epidemiological studies can be used in dose–response modelling with several different options being presented. Finally, the guidance addresses the application of uncertainty factors in risk characterisation when using evidence from human epidemiological studies.
Tipologia CRIS:
Articolo su rivista
Keywords:
epidemiological studies; evidence integration; exposure assessment; hazard characterisation; risk assessment; risk of bias
Elenco autori:
More, S.; Bampidis, V.; Benford, D.; Bragard, C.; Hernandez-Jerez, A.; Bennekou, S. H.; Koutsoumanis, K.; Lambre, C.; Machera, K.; Mennes, W.; Mullins, E.; Nielsen, S. S.; Schlatter, J.; Schrenk, D.; Turck, D.; Younes, M.; Fletcher, T.; Greiner, M.; Ntzani, E.; Pearce, N.; Vinceti, M.; Vrijheid, M.; Georgiadis, M.; Gervelmeyer, A.; Halldorsson, T. I.
Autori di Ateneo:
VINCETI Marco
Link alla scheda completa:
https://iris.unimore.it/handle/11380/1349766
Link al Full Text:
https://iris.unimore.it//retrieve/handle/11380/1349766/682980/EFS2-22-e8866.pdf
Pubblicato in:
EFSA JOURNAL
Journal
  • Utilizzo dei cookie

Realizzato con VIVO | Designed by Cineca | 26.4.5.0