Skip to Main Content (Press Enter)

Logo UNIMORE
  • ×
  • Home
  • Corsi
  • Insegnamenti
  • Professioni
  • Persone
  • Pubblicazioni
  • Strutture
  • Terza Missione
  • Attività
  • Competenze

UNI-FIND
Logo UNIMORE

|

UNI-FIND

unimore.it
  • ×
  • Home
  • Corsi
  • Insegnamenti
  • Professioni
  • Persone
  • Pubblicazioni
  • Strutture
  • Terza Missione
  • Attività
  • Competenze
  1. Pubblicazioni

Augmentation of the posterior atrophic edentulous maxilla with implants placed in the ulna: a prospective single-blind controlled clinical trial

Articolo
Data di Pubblicazione:
2007
Citazione:
Augmentation of the posterior atrophic edentulous maxilla with implants placed in the ulna: a prospective single-blind controlled clinical trial / Cannizzaro, G., Leone, M., Consolo, U., Ferri, V., Licitra, G., Worthington, H., Esposito, M.. - In: THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS. - ISSN 0882-2786. - STAMPA. - 22:2(2007), pp. 280-288.
Abstract:
Purpose: To evaluate a new method to treat the posterior atrophic edentulous maxilla: dental implants placed in the ulna and transplanted with their surrounding bone blocks as inlays into the sinus. Conventional sinus augmentation with particulated autogenous bone grafts served as a control procedure. Materials and Methods: Fifty-two implants were placed in the ulnas of 20 patients. After 6 weeks, bone blocks containing 1 to 3 implants were harvested and transplanted into the sinuses protruding 3 to 4 mm. Implants were left to heal for 6 weeks. Twenty patients with similar treatment indications treated with particulated bone grafts from the mental symphysis, tibia, or iliac crest acted as controls. Grafts were allowed to heal for 6 months in the control group. Fifty-two control-group implants were allowed to heal for 4 months. The main outcome measures were prosthetic and implant success. Stability of individual implants was assessed with Osstell and Periotest at baseline and after 6 and 12 months of loading. Independent sample chi-square tests, t tests, and paired t tests were used with a significance level of .05. Results: No patient dropped out or withdrew; no prosthesis or implant failed. No major surgical complications were occurred. There were no differences between the 2 groups at any time point in implant stability. Both modalities resulted in a significant increase of implant stability at 6 and 12 months. The mean change ( SD) from baseline to 1 year in Periotest measurements was 1.44 (0.48) in the test and 1.29 (0.58) in the control ( paired t tests; P <.001). For the Osstell, these values were - 5.88 (4.18) and - 5.48 (3.93) for the test and control groups, respectively ( paired t tests: P <.001). Conclusions: Ulna implant block grafting represents an alternative to conventional sinus augmentation, particularly when vertical augmentation is desirable or large iliac crest grafts are needed.
Tipologia CRIS:
Articolo su rivista
Keywords:
atrophic edentulous maxilla
Elenco autori:
Cannizzaro, G; Leone, M; Consolo, Ugo; Ferri, V; Licitra, G; Worthington, H; Esposito, M.
Autori di Ateneo:
CONSOLO Ugo
Link alla scheda completa:
https://iris.unimore.it/handle/11380/612363
Pubblicato in:
THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS
Journal
  • Utilizzo dei cookie

Realizzato con VIVO | Designed by Cineca | 26.5.2.0