Skip to Main Content (Press Enter)

Logo UNIMORE
  • ×
  • Home
  • Degree programmes
  • Modules
  • Jobs
  • People
  • Research Outputs
  • Academic units
  • Third Mission
  • Projects
  • Skills

UNI-FIND
Logo UNIMORE

|

UNI-FIND

unimore.it
  • ×
  • Home
  • Degree programmes
  • Modules
  • Jobs
  • People
  • Research Outputs
  • Academic units
  • Third Mission
  • Projects
  • Skills
  1. Research Outputs

Assessing operator stress in collaborative robotics: A multimodal approach

Academic Article
Publication Date:
2025
Short description:
Assessing operator stress in collaborative robotics: A multimodal approach / Borghi, S.; Ruo, A.; Sabattini, L.; Peruzzini, M.; Villani, V.. - In: APPLIED ERGONOMICS. - ISSN 0003-6870. - 123:(2025), pp. 104418-104418. [10.1016/j.apergo.2024.104418]
abstract:
In the era of Industry 4.0, the study of Human-Robot Collaboration (HRC) in advancing modern manufacturing and automation is paramount. An operator approaching a collaborative robot (cobot) may have feelings of distrust, and experience discomfort and stress, especially during the early stages of training. Human factors cannot be neglected: for efficient implementation, the complex psycho-physiological state and responses of the operator must betaken into consideration. In this study, volunteers were asked to carry out a set of cobot programming tasks, while several physiological signals, such as electroencephalogram (EEG), electrocardiogram (ECG), Galvanic skin response (GSR), and facial expressions were recorded. In addition, a subjective questionnaire (NASA-TLX) was administered at the end, to assess if the derived physiological parameters are related to the subjective perception of stress. Parameters exhibiting a higher degree of alignment with subjective perception are mean Theta (76.67%), Alpha (70.53%) and Beta (67.65%) power extracted from EEG, recovery time (72.86%) and rise time (71.43%) extracted from GSR and heart rate variability (HRV) metrics PNN25 (71.58%), SDNN (70.53%), PNN50 (68.95%) and RMSSD (66.84%). Parameters extracted from raw RR Intervals appear to be more variable and less accurate (42.11%) so as recorded emotions (51.43%).
Iris type:
Articolo su rivista
Keywords:
Human-Robot Collaboration; Cobot programming; Stress evaluation; Wearable sensors; Psycho-physiological signals; Human monitoring
List of contributors:
Borghi, S.; Ruo, A.; Sabattini, L.; Peruzzini, M.; Villani, V.
Authors of the University:
SABATTINI Lorenzo
VILLANI VALERIA
Handle:
https://iris.unimore.it/handle/11380/1366428
Full Text:
https://iris.unimore.it//retrieve/handle/11380/1366428/722232/25JERG.pdf
Published in:
APPLIED ERGONOMICS
Journal
Project:
P2022WKABN - Frailty status in hospitalized persons: artificial intelligence-based detection and technology-assisted home-based empowerment (ART.I.DE.)
  • Use of cookies

Powered by VIVO | Designed by Cineca | 26.4.5.0